Customers only: preview

Reconciling the analytical P&L: where headline revenue goes

How to read an analytical iGaming P&L from GGR through bonuses to NGR, with the fee assumptions explicit, so the net figure can be explained rather than just reported.

For Finance leads, CFOs and analysts

Built for Finance teams

The gap between GGR and NGR is where most of the interesting questions in iGaming finance live, and where most of the arguments start. Headline revenue is easy to quote. Explaining what happened to it on the way to the net figure is the harder, more valuable job, and it depends on making every deduction visible.

Executive summary

An analytical P&L walks the path from gross to net: GGR, then bonuses, fees, taxes and platform costs, then NGR, with product contributions and cashflow alongside. It is built for speed and explanation, on your configured fee assumptions and the cost data available. It is a decision tool, not a statutory audit, and treating it as the former is what makes it fast and useful.

This guide covers reconciling that view with confidence: understanding what an analytical P&L is and is not, making the fee and threshold assumptions explicit so a net figure can be defended, and reconciling product contributions and cashflow so revenue and cash are never confused. The goal is a net number you can walk a board through, line by line, without a spreadsheet rebuild.

1. An analytical P&L is a decision tool, not a statutory one

What it is, and is not

An analytical P&L is designed to answer "why is the net lower than the gross, and by what" in minutes. It does this by applying your configured assumptions (provider fees, payment fees, taxes, platform costs) to connected revenue data and showing the deductions as an explicit waterfall. That is its strength: the assumptions are visible and adjustable, not buried in a closed calculation.

It is not a replacement for your accounting system or a statutory audit, and saying so plainly is what keeps it trustworthy. A finance team uses it to reason and to brief, then reconciles against the books on the books' own schedule. The two jobs are different, and the analytical view earns its place by being fast and explainable, not by being the system of record.

  • Read the P&L as a waterfall: GGR, then each deduction, then NGR, with nothing hidden.
  • Keep it distinct from the statutory accounts; it is for reasoning and briefing, not filing.
  • Treat every deduction as an assumption you can see and change, not a fixed fact.

Customers only

The rest of this guide is for Bounty AI customers.

Full guides, product screens and walkthroughs are available to Bounty AI customers and pilot partners. Access is by invitation, and customer sign-in is not open yet.

  1. 2. Make the fee assumptions explicit
  2. 3. Reconcile product contributions and cashflow
  3. Operational outcome: a net figure you can defend
Pilot on your data

Pilot partners get the full library when their pilot starts.

More in the Client library

All guides