Accountability without a trail
You answer for decisions that live in email threads and spreadsheets.
See what needs review, work the case with the player's context, and keep every decision, access event and consent on record for the regulator.
WhyThe high-risk band grew by 6 this week, and 4 of those players have no open case yet.
Sound familiar?
You answer for decisions that live in email threads and spreadsheets.
Signals exist, but the review and its evidence are hard to reconstruct.
Who saw what, and when, takes days to assemble for a regulator.
What you use
What makes it different for Chief compliance officer and MLRO
A typical day
FAQ
Same tools, different accountability. Risk analysts triage and work cases; as the accountable officer you use Bounty for oversight, audit readiness and the record behind every decision.
No. Risk scores and signals support a human-led review. Your team decides, and Bounty keeps the case, the evidence and the history in one place.
Roles and permissions per product and category, login history and a consent log of acceptance events, reviewable by administrators.
RG concerns are visible before commercial action. Enforcing restrictions on your platform depends on integration and is verified during onboarding.
Other teams
Book a pilot. We set it up in your environment with your data and definitions.
Pilot: your data, in your environment. Demo: sample data, access reviewed within one business day.